How Do Americans Feel About The Courts Subverting President Trump? And What Can We Do About It?
Many of us must have questions about Judge Boasberg. They are generally going unanswered; in fact, the ‘main’ media coverage, as expected, is thus far scant in clarifying what is a real crisis in America’s constitutional separation of powers-- brought on by the judiciary itself.
Judge Boasberg is likely compromised (at least) by to his daughter’s paid advocacy for illegals, yet he hasn’t been called to recuse himself and continues to handle deportation prosecutions in contravention of President Trump’s clear policies.
Chief Justice Roberts himself appears to be collegial with his own previous appointee to the FISA court, Judge Boasberg-- a potentially conflicting relationship that has had a pass so far.
In another aspect, Stephen Miller’s America First Legal (AFL) has filed a suit against a legal ‘administrative’ judicial arm that Roberts heads up—the claim being that Roberts is going after conservative judges by using an administrative remit that is not constitutionally his—but rather President Trump’s—to use. Has our history ever seen a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court accused of usurping the power of the President? The press yawns.
“In the lawsuit filed last week, America First Legal (AFL) argued that the Judicial Conference of the U.S. and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts — two key judicial branch bodies that frame policy and handle the basic functions of the federal courts — are executive branch agencies.
“Such agencies must be overseen by the President, not the courts,” the group, represented by attorney Will Scolinos, claimed, adding that the lawsuit “preserves the separation of powers but also keeps the courts out of politics.”
The Judicial Conference is a policymaking body for the lower federal courts established by Congress to promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. The Administrative office handles the nuts and bolts of the federal judiciary, like budgets and organizing court data.
AFL, which dubs itself “the long-awaited answer to the ACLU,” claimed the two judicial bodies are a part of the executive branch by filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against them. FOIA strictly applies to the executive branch and independent federal regulatory agencies, but not to Congress or the federal courts.”
So far, the MSM reaction to Stephen Miller’s AFL suit has been mostly dismissive or derisive.
Even if public awareness of the danger we are in becomes acute, to whom does the America public resort, when the courts themselves are in concert with those who seek to destroy American citizenship via massive illegal immigration and crime?
U.S. Senator Grassley has stepped out to legislate a stop to district judges exceeding their remit by weighing in with force on national, not district, issues--see those now blocking President Trump from the administration of his constitutional powers regarding deportation:
“For a number of years, but particularly in the last few months, we’ve increasingly seen sweeping orders from individual district judges that dictate national policy. Our Founders saw an important role for the judiciary, but the Constitution limits judges to exercising power over ‘cases’ or ‘controversies.’ Judges are not policymakers, and allowing them to assume this role is very dangerous,” Grassley said. “The Judicial Relief Clarification Act clarifies the scope of judicial power and resolves illegitimate judicial infringement upon the executive branch. It’s a commonsense bill that’s needed to provide long-term constitutional clarity and curb district courts’ growing tendency to overstep by issuing sweeping, nationwide orders.”
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/grassley-introduces-legislation-to-clarify-the-scope-of-judicial-relief
But does the U.S. Senate, led by Senator Grassley, have the backbone/votes to successfully legislate to delimit the ruling scope of district judges (all of them leftists, at this writing)? Even if so, how long will the Grassley efforts take? How long do we have?
How has this happened? Any American need look no further than following the quasi-demonic progress of George Soros, over his decades of corrupt interference in American politics (his ‘philanthropy’ having been expelled from his native Hungary due to Soros’ major association with disruptive mass migration into Hungary).
George Soros has over decades, in great part due to the influence and the wealthy reach of his Open Society Foundations, assembled a legal cadre to do his bidding. His political network now includes far more American lawyer-politicos and judges, beyond the most visible examples (such as the Clintons), and a host of scratch-my back, up and coming legal eagles. Many of these justice warriors have legal credentials compromised by the debased quality, probity, and morality of post-graduate professional education in the United States. Look no further than our failing medical schools or look to the Ivy League law schools who are, their excessive endowed wealth notwithstanding, committed to cheating citizens of our taxes for education in order to encourage a range of extra-curricular racial bigotry and far left political interference.
Now several judges in the district courts appear to be waging coordinated constitutional lawfare against President Trump. This new lawfare is not just an “appearance” of organized disruption: it is a political judicial effort, unprecedented in numbers, against a sitting president, primarily bank-rolled by such as Soros Inc. but doubtless supported by many like-minded globalist billionaires--those politically tasked in our lifetimes, by such as Obama, to destroy America as we used to know it.
The work of such as Soros and Obama now spans generations and newly undermines the United States via its most feared, respected, and veiled branch: the judiciary. Many of us worried that it would be a corrupted military that orchestrated a leftist coup against America. We were wrong. We know now that these fresh blows to patriotism, coming undeniably from the left, are in the hands of judges of every stripe, and come at the behest of the globalists who favor and need mass migration to sustain an unheard of privilege for themselves.
The vile judicial persecution of President Trump, as a presidential candidate and throughout his first embattled term and Biden’s one very easy term, is a governmental vendetta that has now been clearly substantiated in official revelations of recent weeks (despite the past and current denials of all of our major press and many in Congress and the courts). Despite these warnings from the recent past, we are not prepared for the current and outrageous obstruction of justice by justice itself.
What to do? The America that elected President Trump only did so by a powerfully uncompromising and public show of our voices, by our votes. That America is now challenged, immediately, to force the U.S. Senate, House, and, most pointedly, the U.S. Supreme Court to act and rein in a historic, destructive judicial overreach.